Beyond The Cocoa Harvest: Explaining The Truth Behind The half-baked Transparency Claims Within The Cocoa-Chocolate Industry
Exploring the hidden layers of 'transparency' in the cocoa-chocolate industry. What does it really reveal about sustainability, ethical business practices, and the distribution of value?
In recent years, the cocoa-chocolate industry has been awash with the term 'transparency,' a concept touted as the remedy for sustainability and ethical business practices. This buzzword is displayed in corporate reports and marketing campaigns, suggesting a noble commitment to openness and honesty. But is this transparency all-encompassing, or does it mask a more complex reality? As consumers increasingly demand ethical sourcing and sustainability, the industry's response has been to highlight their transparency, particularly in terms of environmental practices and relationships with cocoa farmers. However, a closer examination raises critical questions: What does transparency truly entail in this context, and how far does it extend in the intricate web of cocoa-chocolate production and distribution?
As we delve into this narrative, it becomes imperative to dissect the layers of this transparency claim. Is it merely a strategic buzzword used to placate consumers and stakeholders, or does it represent a genuine shift towards more equitable and sustainable practices? This article aims to untie these knots, offering a deeper insight into the reality behind the transparency facade in the cocoa-chocolate industry. I have already done a detailed case study analysis of Koa’s transparency system.
The True Meaning of Transparency and Its Industry Application
Transparency, in its essence, is about clarity, openness, and accountability in operations and decision-making processes. In a business context, it implies giving stakeholders a clear view of how operations are conducted, decisions are made, and profits are distributed. This principle is particularly vital in industries like cocoa-chocolate, where supply chains are complex and global.
However, when we turn our lens to the cocoa-chocolate industry, the application of transparency often seems narrowed to specific areas, particularly in sustainability and ethical sourcing. For instance, companies proudly disclose their initiatives to prevent child labour or to ensure environmentally sustainable farming practices. While these are undoubtedly important, one can't help but notice the selective nature of this transparency. It tends to focus heavily on the start of the supply chain – the cocoa farmers – and less on the subsequent stages like manufacturing, marketing, and profit distribution.
This selective transparency raises crucial questions. When companies like Mondelez and Cargill emphasize their farmer-focused programs, what are they omitting about the rest of their operations? Is the spotlight on the farmers a strategic move to divert attention from less palatable aspects of their business, such as profit margins, internal financial operations, or pricing strategies? As we examine these questions, it becomes apparent that the industry's transparency might not be as comprehensive as it appears.
To understand the depth of transparency in the cocoa-chocolate industry, let's examine the practices of some major players through case studies. Consider Cargill and Mondelez, two giants in this sector. Both companies have made commitments to transparency, focusing on sustainable sourcing and ethical practices. However, a closer look reveals that this transparency predominantly revolves around their interactions with cocoa farmers.
Cargill, for example, has initiatives showcasing their efforts in sustainable farming and improving farmers' livelihoods. Mondelez's Cocoa Life program similarly highlights their commitment to empowering cocoa farmers. While these efforts are commendable, they offer limited visibility into the companies' broader operations. There is a notable lack of detailed disclosure regarding their pricing strategies, profit margins, or the economic realities of their supply chain beyond the farm gate.
This pattern of selective transparency raises critical questions about the authenticity of the industry's commitment to openness. While focusing on farmer welfare is crucial, it should not be the sole lens through which companies view transparency. By concentrating the narrative on the beginning of the supply chain, these major players may be diverting attention from other vital areas where transparency is equally necessary. This approach creates a partial view of their operations, potentially obscuring practices that might not align with the ethical and sustainable image they strive to project.
Beyond Farmer Payments
A key aspect often missing in the transparency narrative is the distribution of value along the cocoa-chocolate supply chain. The focus tends to be heavily skewed towards what the farmers are paid, which, while crucial, is only a part of the entire picture. This selective transparency raises questions about the distribution of profits and costs further up the chain, especially within the realms of manufacturing, marketing, and final retail.
Do you agree that the beautifully illustrated value distribution in the coffee sector below offers a solid foundation for genuine transparency discussion? It sheds light on the often-overlooked stakeholders who reap significant benefits from the value chain yet remain absent from conversations around fairness and transparency within the value chain. Share your thoughts with me.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Cocoa Diaries Newsletter to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.